I was checking out this article in Fortune Magazine on line today (another piece about expensive baby gear - but this one doesn't have a quote
from me unfortunately, so I was, as you can imagine, not very interested) when I saw a link to this: 10 most dangerous toys.
Now I don't know what it says about me, but I was expecting some really heinous stuff - wood burning kits, poisonous chemistry sets, giant plastic bags. But these dangerous toy lists every year (apparently put out by W.A.T.C.H. or World Against Toys Causing Harm) must be working, because the stuff in this year's list doesn't seem all that scary. There are toys that have small parts or fur that could cause choking, guns that shoot toy arrows or silly string at a high velocity, and those giant foam fist-hands that "made the list because it could cause blunt impact injuries." Duh.
The scariest thing on the list is a pair of "anti-gravity boots" (pictured) that look like a broken arm waiting to happen. They also look like the most fun.
So check out the list to find out which toy horse has poorly rooted fur, and congratulations to W.A.T.C.H. for keeping the really scary stuff off of the store shelves entirely. And don't be surprised on Christmas if little cousin Jimmy starts smacking you with his new giant fists.
Blinging up baby (that headline is way too easy) [Fortune on CNN.com] (via modern day great-aunt Jeanne - thanks!)
10 most dangerous toys [CNN.com]
You have to kinda wonder what kind of doofus parents need a list of toys with minor defects that are potentially injurious to children. I mean: I'm doing my X-mas shopping for the kids right now and I ain't using no list of Do Not Buy These Toys to steer me. I'm using the list of what I think my kids would like/need.
Hell, anybody who needs to use a list like the one linked here is probably just somebody who buys toys at random en masse hoping something will score with the kids. Ridiculous.
Posted by: William Young | December 05, 2005 at 05:10 AM